Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | From | "Paul Rolland" <> | Subject | Re: 2.4.x release process comments | Date | Thu, 20 Feb 2003 14:11:46 +0100 |
| |
Hello,
> I'm not saying it should, but it would be good from a PR > perspective and as > an element in the reliability feeling vector ;-) Not sure about it... People like it when a product looks stable, and having a -blah or -pre and so on once a week doesn't make me feel I have some stable product...
> The number of -pre releases shouldn't be limited for its own sake, but > rather in the process of stabilising the kernel for release. > So I mean after > a couple of -pre releases start focussing on debugging and > then finish with > a few -rc's before the next cycle starts. That way the diffs > between full > versions are smaller and upgrading gets easier. So, the question is to choose between : - less releases with more changes or - more relaseases with less changes
Is that correct ?
Paul
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |