Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Tue, 18 Feb 2003 16:05:04 +0000 | From | John Levon <> | Subject | Re: module changes |
| |
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 04:56:11PM +0100, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> Does the implementation have to be perfect? The per_cpu API can easily > be simulated using good old NR_CPUS arrays:
I agree, the main advantage of having per-cpu API available to modules is that code can just use it and not worry about module vs. monolithic. Some obscure limitation doesn't sound like a good idea in that respect :)
regards john - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |