Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:09:22 -0500 | From | Jeff Garzik <> | Subject | Re: 2.5.60 cheerleading... |
| |
Paul Larson wrote: > On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 09:52, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >>Just to counteract all the 2.5.60 bug reports... >> >>After the akpm wave of compile fixes, I booted 2.5.60-BK on my Wal-Mart >>PC [via epia], and ran LTP on it, while also stressing it using >>fsx-linux in another window. The LTP run showed a few minor failures, >>but overall 2.5.60-BK is surviving just fine, and with no corruption. > > Can you send me your list of failures and version of LTP? I'd like to > make sure they match up with the known list of problems.
Version is CVS-latest, checked out last night.
Some of the failures were obvious: kernel module syscalls were failing, as I would expect them to if they had not been updated for 2.5.x module support. There were also a couple signal-related things, IIRC. Unexpected failures included some file locking test failures.
Anyway, don't worry... you will be getting more concrete info soon :) I am tracking down right now why the 2.5.x floppy driver ends all I/O requests with an error. After that, I'll have output from a full LTP run for you :)
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |