Messages in this thread | | | From | (Måns Rullgård) | Subject | Re: State of devfs in 2.6? | Date | Tue, 09 Dec 2003 11:57:48 +0100 |
| |
Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org> writes:
> My initial query has thrown up lots of interesting debate :) > > I, like most people I suspect, love the concept of a complete auto-populated > dev directory, and not having to MAKEDEV.
So do I.
> devfs provided this, but like most people who read LKML, I stopped using it > when it's problems were discussed. > > I really hope udev lives up to its promise, unlike devfs. Manually creating / > dev just annoys me for no apparent reason other than it's plain inelegance I > suppose.
Does anyone else remember all the talk about the supreme elegance of devfs back when it was new?
-- Måns Rullgård mru@kth.se
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |