Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 9 Dec 2003 15:18:37 +0100 | From | Tomasz Torcz <> | Subject | Re: sensors vs 2.6 |
| |
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 07:41:31AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > So obviously something didn't get built, and it looks like its the > winbond stuff. The question is why? Is there some method that can > be used to interrogate the kernel and determine if the stuff is > actually in there?
Maybe related: via sensors stuff is very picky about order of module loading. It does NOT work when i2c-dev, i2c-algo-bit and rest of sensors stuff (isa bus, via modules) are built INTO kernel. When everything is in modules, iw works ONLY when via modules are modprobed _before_ anything using i2c. Loading other i2c modules (bttv, lirc or sth else) before via modules makes sensors unusable - there is no /sys/[...]/via directory, or this directory is empty.
-- Tomasz Torcz "Funeral in the morning, IDE hacking zdzichu@irc.-nie.spam-.pl in the afternoon and evening." - Alan Cox |> Playing: stream1.jungletrain.net:8000 ... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |