lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: sensors vs 2.6
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 07:41:31AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> So obviously something didn't get built, and it looks like its the
> winbond stuff. The question is why? Is there some method that can
> be used to interrogate the kernel and determine if the stuff is
> actually in there?

Maybe related: via sensors stuff is very picky about order of module
loading.
It does NOT work when i2c-dev, i2c-algo-bit and rest of sensors stuff
(isa bus, via modules) are built INTO kernel.
When everything is in modules, iw works ONLY when via modules are
modprobed _before_ anything using i2c.
Loading other i2c modules (bttv, lirc or sth else) before via modules
makes sensors unusable - there is no /sys/[...]/via directory,
or this directory is empty.


--
Tomasz Torcz "Funeral in the morning, IDE hacking
zdzichu@irc.-nie.spam-.pl in the afternoon and evening." - Alan Cox
|> Playing: stream1.jungletrain.net:8000 ...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.029 / U:1.564 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site