Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 8 Dec 2003 17:27:32 +0100 | From | Rafal Skoczylas <> |
| |
On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 09:17:35PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Rafal Skoczylas wrote: > > Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 5a85fb5c > > [...] > > EIP: 0060:[remove_wait_queue+36/112] Not tainted > > [...] > > eax: defb4000 ebx: da85fb58 ecx: 5a85fb58 edx: db0468b0 > > esi: db0468bc edi: 00000292 ebp: defb5fa0 esp: defb5f58 > > Trace: > > [poll_freewait+36/80] poll_freewait+0x24/0x50 > > [sys_poll+581/656] sys_poll+0x245/0x290 > > [__pollwait+0/208] __pollwait+0x0/0xd0 > > [syscall_call+7/11] syscall_call+0x7/0xb > > It could be bad memory. We even know the address that is bad: it's > (%esi+4), ie bit 31 of the word at physical address 0x1b0468f0. > However, if you don't see random SIGSEGV's while compiling etc issues, it > doesnt' sound like flaky RAM.
Indeed, I do not have any random SIGSEGVs at any time. Additionaly, as what you said sounded right to me I performed extensive memory tests with x86-memtest v3.0 during the night and as I expected memory seems to be OK.
> Rafal - how consistent is the second form of the oops? > Have you seen that trace more than once?
Not exactly the same, but there are some similarities (If I understand this log correctly). I ripped those oopses out of the logs so maybe you could look yourself and see something I don't see: http://secprog.org/who/rs/linux/2.6-test11-log.txt These are oopses I have experienced on test11 (Unfortunately, I dont have logs from test9 since I don't keep logs that long on workstation).
nils. -- "Blessed is the man, who having nothing to say, abstains from giving wordy evidence of the fact." -- http://secprog.org/who/rs/quote.php?id=1 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |