Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Subject | Re: Linux GPL and binary module exception clause? | From | Arjan van de Ven <> | Date | Fri, 05 Dec 2003 20:22:34 +0100 |
| |
On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 20:09, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: \ > Interestingly enough, at least on my Fedora box, 'rpm -qi' reports glibc as LGPL, > but glibc-kernheaders as GPL, which seems right to me - linking against glibc gives > the LGPL semantics as we'd want, but forces userspace that's poking in the kernel > to be GPL as a derived work....
but those headers do not have inlines etc etc just the bare minimum of structures and defines (neither of which result in code in the binary ) [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |