Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 30 Dec 2003 12:02:37 +0000 | Subject | Re: [2.4.18] oops in lvm or raid | From | Roger Gammans <> |
| |
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 06:16:10PM +0100, Christophe Saout wrote: > Am Mo, den 29.12.2003 schrieb Roger Gammans um 15:59: > > > Dec 29 13:15:23 turin kernel: lvm -- giving up to snapshot /dev/rootvg/data_root on /dev/rootvg/data_20031218: out of spa > > Dec 29 13:15:23 turin kernel: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 00015618 > > Dec 29 13:15:23 turin kernel: printing eip: > > Dec 29 13:15:23 turin kernel: c4847a7c > > c4847a7c -> lvm_snapshot_remap_block (c4847a0c) > > > > This is a stock kernel (bf2.4) from debian stable (Version: 2.4.18-5) > > LVM1 snapshotting in the plain 2.4.18 kernel is known to have bugs.
Ah. Ok. But to be honest I could have (and indeed should have) deleted the sanpshot before doing the write to the volume which caused the snapshot ot run out of space. As long as the snapshot intergrity is good I'm happy.
My real worry is taht this was triggered by a raid problem and we've got serious data corruption in both the ext3 and lvm metadata.
> You should upgrade to the latest LVM 1.0.8 kernel code. Well, I can't > access the Sistina website at the moment. I'm sure you can find a > lvm_1.0.8.tar.gz (or lvm_1.0.7.tar.gz which also has most bugs fixed) > somewhere.
The site seems to be back now.
> [snip] > Or you can upgrade to the 2.4.23 kernel, I think it contains the LVM > 1.0.7 code.
Ok. We need to make some sort of decision here about what kernel to use then there has been an degree of discusson about exactly how conservative we should be anyway . Does 2.4.23 have the vfs-locking patch ?
TTFN -- Roger. Home| http://www.sandman.uklinux.net/ Master of Peng Shui. (Ancient oriental art of Penguin Arranging) Work|Independent Sys Consultant | http://www.computer-surgery.co.uk/ So what are the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of 'The Matrix'? --anon [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |