Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Tue, 30 Dec 2003 10:47:10 -0800 (PST) | From | Linus Torvalds <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.0-test6: APM unable to suspend (the 2.6.0-test2 saga continues) |
| |
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Russell King wrote: > > - i8042_noaux=1 - this doesn't seem to make any difference, although > this does appear to leave the CTR set as 0x65, which appears to be > the BIOS-set value.
Doesn't that leave the kbd mask the same? In particular, it still sets the "disable" bit, aka I8042_CTR_KBDDIS later on..
What happens if you just define I8042_CTR_KBDDIS to zero?
Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |