Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Fri, 26 Dec 2003 21:47:55 -0500 (EST) | From | Rik van Riel <> | Subject | Re: Page aging broken in 2.6 |
| |
On Fri, 26 Dec 2003, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I'll let Rik and Andrea argue that part - it's entirely possible that > getting lots of positive results is a _good_ thing, if the same page is > mapped multiple times. That would just make us less eager to unmap it, > which sounds like potentially the right thign to do (it's also how the > old non-rmap code worked, and I know Rik thought it was "unfair", but > whatever).
I'm really not sure which of the two behaviours would perform better. Chances are both behaviours will show some performance improvement over the other, depending on the workload...
Rik -- "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |