Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Wed, 17 Dec 2003 19:57:43 -0500 | From | Jeff Garzik <> | Subject | Re: cciss update for 2.4.24-pre1, 2 of 2 |
| |
Andrew Morton wrote: > It will still be a busy loop if this task has a signal pending. > TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE may be more appropriate...
Agreed. Same reason you want to use down() instead of down_interruptible(), when using a semaphore to wait on some hardware condition.
Jeff
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |