Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 16 Dec 2003 00:13:21 +0100 | From | Andrea Arcangeli <> | Subject | Re: RFC - tarball/patch server in BitKeeper |
| |
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 02:44:38PM -0800, Tupshin Harper wrote: > NO!!! In this case, you are not using bk, you are accessing information > that is placed in a public place. If your argument were to hold any
that is what I meant with the "web" of course (not the web in the sense of the world wide web at large), with the "web" I meant the bkbits.net website of course.
> water, then people constrained from using bk due to any clause of the > bkl could not access any information on bkbits.net. The mere act of > pointing their browser there would be a violation. Since these people
correct.
> Either browsing bkbits.net is a use of bk and non-licensed people can't > use it, or it is is not a use of bk and none of the bkl restrictions > apply. Can't have it both ways.
agreed. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |