Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Sat, 8 Nov 2003 11:46:05 -0800 (PST) | From | Linus Torvalds <> | Subject | Re: 2.6-test6: nanosleep+SIGCONT weirdness |
| |
On Sat, 8 Nov 2003, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > > Of course it's supported. the clock_* functions are in librt. And they > are supported and, when working, greatly increase the usability. The > old user-level implementation is as good as we get it but really not up > to the job.
Okey-dokey - I verified that the clock_nanosleep() function is also broken.
I'll see if I can see what the mess is all about. That posix-timer "retry" code really is a pretty horrible thing.
Linus
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |