lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Nov]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.6-test6: nanosleep+SIGCONT weirdness

On Sat, 8 Nov 2003, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
>
> Of course it's supported. the clock_* functions are in librt. And they
> are supported and, when working, greatly increase the usability. The
> old user-level implementation is as good as we get it but really not up
> to the job.

Okey-dokey - I verified that the clock_nanosleep() function is also
broken.

I'll see if I can see what the mess is all about. That posix-timer "retry"
code really is a pretty horrible thing.

Linus


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-18 23:46    [W:0.019 / U:0.428 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site