Messages in this thread | | | From | Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <> | Subject | Re: Silicon Image 3112A SATA trouble | Date | Sun, 30 Nov 2003 18:13:48 +0100 |
| |
On Sunday 30 of November 2003 18:08, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Sun, Nov 30 2003, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > Yes, it would be better to have a per-drive (or hwif) extra limiting > > > factor if it is needed. For this case it really isn't, so probably not > > > the best idea :) > > > > > > > Tangent: My non-pessimistic fix will involve submitting a single > > > > sector DMA r/w taskfile manually, then proceeding with the remaining > > > > sectors in another r/w taskfile. This doubles the interrupts on the > > > > affected chipset/drive combos, but still allows large requests. I'm > > > > not terribly > > > > > > Or split the request 50/50. > > > > We can't - hardware will lock up. > > I know the problem. Then don't split 50/50 to the word, my point was to > split it closer to 50/50 than 1 sector + the rest.
Oh, I understand now and agree.
--bart
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |