lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Nov]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: What exactly are the issues with 2.6.0-test10 preempt?
On Tue, Nov 25 2003, kernel wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I know it's binary only, but the NVidia driver produces the folowing
> which I thought might help in determining where this problem lies.
>
>
> If its useful I can supply more info.
>
>
> Regards, Mark.
>
>
> Debug: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.c:1856
> in_atomic():1, irqs_disabled():0
> Call Trace:
> [<c01202ac>] __might_sleep+0xac/0xe0
> [<c0145a18>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x78/0x80

Not really, it just shows the nvidia driver being buggy and using a
sleeping gfp allocation mask when it should not.

--
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58    [W:0.021 / U:0.988 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site