Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Thu, 20 Nov 2003 11:26:55 +0530 | From | Maneesh Soni <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] sysfs_remove_dir Vs dcache_readdir race fix |
| |
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 05:49:57AM +0000, viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk wrote: > On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 11:17:07AM +0530, Maneesh Soni wrote: > > Hi, > > > > sysfs_remove_dir modifies d_subdirs list which results in inconsistency > > when there is concurrent dcache_readdir is going on. I think there > > is no need for sysfs_remove_dir to modify d_subdirs list and removal > > of dentries from d_child list is taken care in the final dput(). > > WTF? > > All instances of ->readdir() are protected by ->i_sem on parent. So > are all operations in sysfs_remove_dir(). > > Have you actually observed any race there?
Yes.. if you run the mentioned two loops on an SMP box, you will find that dcache_readdir is looping with dcache_lock held up in less than a minute. The problem comes when sysfs_remove_dir has done list_del_init on the cursor dentry which is being used in dcache_readdir. Please enable pr_debug() also in sysfs_remove_dir to see the this happening.
Maneesh
-- Maneesh Soni Linux Technology Center, IBM Software Lab, Bangalore, India email: maneesh@in.ibm.com Phone: 91-80-5044999 Fax: 91-80-5268553 T/L : 9243696 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |