lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Nov]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Nick's scheduler v17a


Rhino wrote:

>On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 14:41:07 +1100
>Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au> wrote:
>
>
>>http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/v17a/
>>
>>More balancing fixes. I also incorporated some of Andrew Theurer's
>>ideas. I'm generally getting good numbers now, but using fairly
>>synthetic benchmarks.
>>
>>Now would be a good time to test if anyone is interested. Thanks.
>>
>
>well i didn't have the time to make extensive tests yet, but the behaviour improved a lot since v16,
>and *looks* quite better compared to test9 on a 2 way xeon p4 with hyperthreading enabled,
>seeing 4 cpu's.
>
>when i get back home, I'll try to make a few benchmarks.
>

That would be nice. There still isn't a lot of work done in the HT
department, but something simple and easy like the shared runqueues
patch might be reasonable for 2.6.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58    [W:0.122 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site