Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Mon, 03 Nov 2003 15:47:11 +1100 | From | Nick Piggin <> | Subject | Re: Nick's scheduler v17a |
| |
Rhino wrote:
>On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 14:41:07 +1100 >Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au> wrote: > > >>http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/v17a/ >> >>More balancing fixes. I also incorporated some of Andrew Theurer's >>ideas. I'm generally getting good numbers now, but using fairly >>synthetic benchmarks. >> >>Now would be a good time to test if anyone is interested. Thanks. >> > >well i didn't have the time to make extensive tests yet, but the behaviour improved a lot since v16, >and *looks* quite better compared to test9 on a 2 way xeon p4 with hyperthreading enabled, >seeing 4 cpu's. > >when i get back home, I'll try to make a few benchmarks. >
That would be nice. There still isn't a lot of work done in the HT department, but something simple and easy like the shared runqueues patch might be reasonable for 2.6.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |