Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | From | (bill davidsen) | Subject | Re: [Fastboot] kexec update (2.6.0-test7) | Date | 9 Oct 2003 21:27:35 GMT |
| |
In article <m1y8vufe5l.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote: | Cherry George Mathew <cherry@sdf.lonestar.org> writes: | | > On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Randy.Dunlap wrote: | > | > > You'll need to update the kexec-syscall.c file for the correct | > > kexec syscall number (274). | > | > Is there a consensus about what the syscall number will finally be ? We've | > jumped from 256 to 274 over the 2.5.x+ series kernels. Or is it the law | > the Jungle ? | | So far the law of the jungle. Regardless of the rest it looks like it | is time to submit a place keeping patch.
Forgive me if the politics of this have changed, but will a place keeping patch be accepted for a feature which has not? -- bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |