Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 7 Oct 2003 13:52:44 -0700 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | Re: devfs and udev |
| |
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 11:47:41PM +0300, insecure wrote: > On Tuesday 07 October 2003 22:41, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 09:28:09PM +0300, insecure wrote: > > > What am I supposed to do, starting to use mknod again? Uggggh... > > > > Provide me with a kernel name to devfs name mapping file so that I can > > create a "devfs like" udev config file for people who happen to like > > that naming scheme. > > It seems that we have a bit of misunderstanding here. > > I just don't want to go back to /dev being actually placed on > real, on-disk fs. > > I won't mind if naming scheme will change as long > as device names start with '/dev/' and appear > there (semi-)automagically. That's what I call devfs. > If udev can do this, I am all for that.
udev can do this. Is there some documentation that you read that has suggested otherwise?
greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |