Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Linux 2.6.0-test6 (compile statistics) | From | John Cherry <> | Date | 06 Oct 2003 13:39:14 -0700 |
| |
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 10:44, Jesper Juhl wrote: [snip] > > I was wondering if there would be any point in doing these builds with > "allnoconfig" as well? > Could this possibly flush out some warnings/errors that only occur when > something is left out? > >
The compile regressions now build with allnoconfig as well for both Linus' tree and Andrew's tree. Check out...
http://developer.osdl.org/cherry/compile/
BTW, the latest compile stats for test6-mm3 and test6-mm4 are:
Kernel version: 2.6.0-test6-mm4 Kernel build: Making bzImage (defconfig): 0 warnings, 0 errors Making modules (defconfig): 0 warnings, 0 errors Making bzImage (allnoconfig): 1 warnings, 0 errors Making bzImage (allyesconfig): 179 warnings, 1 errors Making modules (allyesconfig): 9 warnings, 0 errors Making bzImage (allmodconfig): 3 warnings, 0 errors Making modules (allmodconfig): 234 warnings, 1 errors
Kernel version: 2.6.0-test6-mm3 Kernel build: Making bzImage (defconfig): 0 warnings, 0 errors Making modules (defconfig): 0 warnings, 0 errors Making bzImage (allnoconfig): 1 warnings, 0 errors Making bzImage (allyesconfig): 178 warnings, 1 errors Making modules (allyesconfig): 9 warnings, 0 errors Making bzImage (allmodconfig): 3 warnings, 0 errors Making modules (allmodconfig): 252 warnings, 1 errors
John
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |