Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 24 Oct 2003 20:38:52 +0200 | From | Dominik Brodowski <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] 3/3 Dynamic cpufreq governor and updates to ACPI P-state driver |
| |
Vetoed.
cpufreq_dynamic is too generic, there are different approaches == different governors in the work which are all "dynamic".
Dominik
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 02:50:06PM -0700, Nakajima, Jun wrote: > Me too, because it would be consistent with the other ones; i.e. how the > user perceives them.
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 01:47:49PM -0700, Moore, Robert wrote: > > I would vote for "cpufreq_dynamic" > > Bob
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 04:17:04PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Could you name it cpufreq_demand? We have enough > TLAs as is. > Pavwl
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |