Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | From | Jan De Luyck <> | Subject | Re: [2.6.0-test8] Difference between Software Suspend and Suspend-to-disk? | Date | Tue, 21 Oct 2003 14:16:41 +0200 |
| |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 21 October 2003 13:40, Måns Rullgård wrote: > Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com> writes: > >> Software Suspend (EXPERIMENTAL) > >> Suspend-to-Disk Support > > > > They're competing implementations of the same mechanism. > > And neither one works reliably, I might add. They both appear to save > the current state to disk, but no matter what I try, I can't make it > resume properly.
Well, I could suspend/resume correctly first time I tried (runlevel 2 and disabling nearly everything to minimize loss of data on crash).
The second test in X resulted in a 'double fault'...
Jan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/lSOrUQQOfidJUwQRAsV8AJ0WGVwtPCvoRU+nYzp+1rEPGjHrDwCffiZz wEG77k6o4VjLOb3dMvyLopg= =uta/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |