lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Oct]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [BENCHMARK] I/O regression after 2.6.0-test5
Hi Guys,
If you have time, would you please try testing as-iosched.c from
test5 in a later kernel (it won't go into test8-mm1 though).

Thanks


venom@sns.it wrote:

>me too, on some self made db benchs on both mysql and postgresql, testing, of
>course, I/O.
>
>On Sun, 19 Oct 2003, Dave Olien wrote:
>
>
>>Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 21:51:23 -0700
>>From: Dave Olien <dmo@osdl.org>
>>To: rwhron@earthlink.net
>>Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org
>>Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] I/O regression after 2.6.0-test5
>>
>>
>>Yup, we've seen similar regression on tiobench and reaim workloads.
>>
>>On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 08:37:45PM -0400, rwhron@earthlink.net wrote:
>>
>>>There was about a 50% regression in jobs/minute in AIM7
>>>database workload on quad P3 Xeon. The CPU time has not
>>>gone up, so the extra run time is coming from something
>>>else. (I/O or I/O scheduler?)
>>>
>>>tiobench sequential reads has a significant regression too.
>>>
>>>Regression appears unrelated to filesystem type.
>>>
>>>dbench was not affected.
>>>
>>>The AIM7 was run on ext2.
>>>
>>>
>>>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58    [W:0.065 / U:0.252 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site