Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 15 Oct 2003 20:55:53 +0100 | From | viro@parcelfa ... | Subject | Re: [PATCH] tmpfs 2/7 LTP S_ISGID dir |
| |
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 08:48:59PM +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote: > On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 07:19:46PM +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote: > > > LTP tests the filesystem on /tmp: many failures when tmpfs because > > > it missed the way giddy directories hand down their gid. Also fix > > > ramfs and hugetlbfs. > > > > *the* way? I can think of at least two... > > You mean, the way they do directories and the way they do non-directories? > Or, the way they do it if they do it, and the way they do it if they don't? > Or something else? Please, share your thought!
"We always inherit parents gid, sgid is ignored" and "we do that only if parent is sgid and children that happen to be directories inherit sgid from parent". Yes, ramfs et.al. follow neither of those, but which way to change that is an interesting question... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |