Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 14 Oct 2003 07:46:53 +0100 | From | viro@parcelfa ... | Subject | Re: 2.7 thoughts: common well-architected object model |
| |
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 10:31:55PM -0700, retu wrote: > Now here's the competition: > > System [snip the revolting offense against Occam's Razor] > System.Xml.Xsl > > These are massive and can't be built in a day. But > with a very decent component model and design > philosphy on what to put in and what not it would > enable people to quickly fill in the blanks (plus > maybe some rapid abstracting/wrapping) which would do > a very lot for the OS.
Please, take your cargo-cult education somewhere else. You are yet to show that you understand what does "component model" mean, let alone to demonstrate that you are capable of discussing benefits of such beasts. "It had been mentioned in lecture notes" doesn't cut it. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |