Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Mon, 13 Oct 2003 13:15:58 -0700 | From | Tom Rini <> | Subject | Re: devfs and udev |
| |
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 10:09:33PM +0000, bill davidsen wrote: > In article <20031007213758.GB3095@kroah.com>, > Greg KH <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> wrote: > > | mount -t ramfs none /dev > | > | That is what udev will run off of :) > | > | Again, can you point me to any documentation that states that udev will > | do this on a persistant filesystem? > > I'm going back to look again, but I don't recall that it won't, either. > If it wants a ramfs on /dev, why doesn't it just create one? That's a > question, not an argument! I had assumed it would run on a persistent > f/s if present.
Whatever f/s udev runs on is independant of udev, it just runs. Ideally distros / packagers should set things up so that it runs on ramfs.
-- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |