Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 11 Oct 2003 21:40:08 +0200 | From | Sam Ravnborg <> | Subject | Re: patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7) |
| |
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 12:08:52PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 14:16:46 -0700 > "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org> wrote: > > > http://developer.osdl.org/rddunlap/patches/atmprocfs_260t7.patch > > How can this be needed? When procfs is disabled then > remove_proc_entry() is defined as "do { } while (0)", ie. a nop.
Due to this - the real offender:
from: net/atm/clip.c: #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS #include <linux/proc_fs.h> #include <linux/seq_file.h> #endif
Sam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |