Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 10 Oct 2003 20:31:51 +0100 | From | Dave Jones <> | Subject | Re: [2.6.0-test7] cpufreq longhaul trouble |
| |
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 09:03:22PM +0200, Jurgen Kramer wrote: > Ok, changing line 394 gives: > > <snip> > longhaul: VIA C3 'Ezra' [C5C] CPU detected. Longhaul v1 supported. > longhaul: MinMult=3.0x MaxMult=6.0x > longhaul: FSB: 133MHz Lowestspeed=399MHz Highestspeed=798MHz > <snip> > > But should it really be v1? With 2.4.20 I get: > ep 28 21:09:28 paradox kernel: longhaul: VIA CPU detected. Longhaul > version 2 supported > Sep 28 21:09:28 paradox kernel: longhaul: CPU currently at 798MHz (133 x > 6.0) > Sep 28 21:09:28 paradox kernel: longhaul: MinMult(x10)=30 > MaxMult(x10)=60 > Sep 28 21:09:28 paradox kernel: longhaul: Lowestspeed=399000 > Highestspeed=798000 > Sep 28 21:09:28 paradox kernel: longhaul: New FSB:133 Mult(x10):60 > Sep 28 21:09:28 paradox kernel: longhaul: New FSB:133 Mult(x10):30
Note that the various speeds etc now match. Why we got away with this in 2.4 I'm not sure, depends which patch you used.
> x86info -a gives (running 2.6.0test7): ... > /dev/cpu/0/msr: No such device
Heh. this was the important bit.. Doesn't matter now anyway.
Dave
-- Dave Jones http://www.codemonkey.org.uk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |