Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 1 Oct 2003 18:57:46 -0400 (EDT) | From | James Morris <> | Subject | Re: sys_vserver |
| |
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Chris Wright wrote: > > > I believe a reasonable portion of vserver can become a security module, > > but there would clearly remain a need for some of the virtualization > > (e.g. hostname, etc.). > > I definately want to have as much as possible of vserver > using the normal security infrastructure, simply because > it will save the vserver maintainers a lot of work ;) >
I think virtualization is important/useful enough to warrant an API of it's own. It could be similar to LSM, e.g. allow pluggable virtualization modules, with no cost for the base kernel.
- James -- James Morris <jmorris@redhat.com>
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |