Messages in this thread | | | From | (bill davidsen) | Subject | Re: Who changed /proc/<pid>/ in 2.6.0-test5-bk9? | Date | 1 Oct 2003 20:21:25 GMT |
| |
In article <20031001115248.GC23819@compsoc.man.ac.uk>, John Levon <levon@movementarian.org> wrote: | On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 10:58:08AM +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote: | | > Linus' 2.6.0-test6 announcement doesn't seem to mention the | > fact that 2.6.0-test5-bk9 fundamentally changed the semantics | > of /proc/self and the /proc/<pid> name space. These used to | | Are these Albert Calahan's changes ? | | For some reason I can't fathom they were sent privately to Linus without | them first being posted publicly anywhere ...
I thought there had been discussion a while ago, but I can't put my finger on it. In any case, I think the OP was noting that it was a fairly impactful (is that a word?) change not to get a line in the changelog. That's directed to whoever actually prepares the CL, not the author of the patch.
-- bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |