Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Thu, 9 Jan 2003 20:19:18 -0800 | From | William Lee Irwin III <> | Subject | Re: 2.4.20, .text.lock.swap cpu usage? (ibm x440) |
| |
William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> I don't know what to tell you here. I'm lucky that this is my day job >> and that I can contribute so much. However, there are plenty who >> contribute major changes (many even more important than my own) without >> any such sponsorship. Perhaps emulating them would satisfy your wish.
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 10:08:55PM -0600, Brian Tinsley wrote: > It would! > I cannot say thanks enough for the efforts of you and everyone else out > there. Frankly, I would not have my day job and would not have been able > to make Emageon what it is today were it not for you all! > Oh, please excuse the stupid humor tonight. I'm in a giddy mood for some > reason. Must be the excitement from the prospect of getting resolution > to this problem!
We're straying from the subject here. Please describe your machine, in terms of how many cpus it has and how much highmem it has, and your workload, so I can better determine the issue. Perhaps we can cooperatively devise something that works well for you.
Or perhaps the kernel version is not up-to-date. Please also provide the precise kernel version (and included patches). And workload too.
Thanks, Bill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |