Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 08 Jan 2003 12:14:51 -0800 | From | george anzinger <> | Subject | Re: [BUG - HRT patch] nanosleep returns 0 on failure |
| |
"Fleischer, Julie N" wrote: > > > george anzinger wrote: > > If you don't mind, I will add your test code to my > > clock_nanosleep test code so this does not creep back in. > > Sure. It's all GPL. The 6-1.c test case (attached below) probably has the > best test because it does multiple values, some < 0, some >= 1000 million. > > One other thing I forgot to write in my previous report is that > clock_nanosleep() appeared to behave as expected, just nanosleep() showed > the issue of returning 0 on failure.
Yes, I found the problem. Thanks for the code and the heads up.
-g > > Thanks. > - Julie > > ---- > test 6-1.c > /* > * Copyright (c) 2002, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. > * Created by: julie.n.fleischer REMOVE-THIS AT intel DOT com > * This file is licensed under the GPL license. For the full content > * of this license, see the COPYING file at the top level of this > * source tree. > > * Test that nanosleep() sets errno to EINVAL if rqtp contained a > * nanosecond value < 0 or >= 1,000 million > */ > #include <stdio.h> > #include <time.h> > #include <errno.h> > > #define PTS_PASS 0 > #define PTS_FAIL 1 > #define PTS_UNRESOLVED 2 > > #define NUMTESTS 7 > > int main(int argc, char *argv[]) > { > struct timespec tssleepfor, tsstorage; > int sleepnsec[NUMTESTS] = {-1, -5, -1000000000, 1000000000, > 1000000001, 2000000000, 2000000000 }; > int i; > int failure = 0; > > tssleepfor.tv_sec=0; > > for (i=0; i<NUMTESTS;i++) { > tssleepfor.tv_nsec=sleepnsec[i]; > printf("sleep %d\n", sleepnsec[i]); > if (nanosleep(&tssleepfor, &tsstorage) == -1) { > if (EINVAL != errno) { > printf("errno != EINVAL\n"); > failure = 1; > } > } else { > printf("nanosleep() did not return -1 on > failure\n"); > return PTS_UNRESOLVED; > } > } > > if (failure) { > printf("At least one test FAILED\n"); > return PTS_FAIL; > } else { > printf("All tests PASSED\n"); > return PTS_PASS; > } > } > **These views are not necessarily those of my employer.** > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-- George Anzinger george@mvista.com High-res-timers: http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/ Preemption patch: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |