Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] linux-2.5.54_delay-cleanup_A0 | From | john stultz <> | Date | 07 Jan 2003 19:48:36 -0800 |
| |
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 19:29, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Wouldn't it be saner to initialize the timer to something that can at > least do estimated loops, and then just unconditionally do > > timer->delay(..); > > instead?
Basically a default timer_null structure? Sure that can be done (I think others have suggested this as well, but I've just not had the time to get around to it). I'll see if I can scratch that out quickly and resend.
thanks for the feedback! -john
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |