Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 5 Jan 2003 23:58:16 +0100 | From | Tomas Szepe <> | Subject | Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? |
| |
> [hps@intermeta.de] > > The original statement was > > --- cut --- > "Microsoft making 370 times more than RedHat says _nothing_ about > their actual achievement in terms of software development." > --- cut ---
And it holds true, because
1) A huge part of RedHat's work in software development goes into free (as in beer) software, which skews the better_product<->higher_revenue correlation vigorously.
2) better_product<->higher_revenue doesn't work terribly well when the market is dominated by a monopoly, does it?
3) Microsoft doesn't only sell software.
...
Don't make me come up with more. Larry's comparison is totally laughable if it is to support the thesis "Microsoft has achieved much more in software development than RedHat."
-- Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |