Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 24 Jan 2003 17:08:28 -0800 (PST) | From | Davide Libenzi <> | Subject | Re: {sys_,/dev/}epoll waiting timeout |
| |
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> (Davide), IMHO epoll should decide whether it means "at minimum" (in > which case the +1 is a requirement), or it means "at maximum" (in > which case rounding up is wrong). > > The current method of rounding up and then effectively down means that > you get an unpredictable mixture of both.
I think I'll go with :
Tj = (Tms * HZ + 999) / 1000
Somehow I feel it more correct :)
- Davide
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |