Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented? | From | Dana Lacoste <> | Date | 22 Jan 2003 10:27:40 -0500 |
| |
On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 10:18, Larry McVoy wrote:
> A boundary is a boundary. It doesn't matter how much you want or need > what is on the other side of that boundary, you don't get to make your > license cross that boundary, the law doesn't work that way.
Thus the concept of "derivative work."
The single most vague section of the GPL IMHO.
Can we move on now? We're not going to resolve anything here, and i think we're all argued out :)
Dana Lacoste Ottawa, Canada
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |