Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Mon, 20 Jan 2003 14:57:54 +0300 | From | Ivan Kokshaysky <> | Subject | Re: pci_child_fixup() |
| |
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 07:52:17PM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > child = pci_add_new_bus(bus, dev, 0); > - child->primary = buses & 0xFF; > - child->secondary = (buses >> 8) & 0xFF; > - child->subordinate = (buses >> 16) & 0xFF; > - child->number = child->secondary; > + pci_child_fixup(bus, child, buses);
The "bus" argument seems to be redundant. Why not use "child->parent" just filled in by pci_add_new_bus() instead?
Ivan. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |