Messages in this thread | | | From | "Folkert van Heusden" <> | Subject | RE: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? | Date | Sat, 18 Jan 2003 14:04:09 +0100 |
| |
> Am I wrong that the above would do the same thing without generating the > sphagetti code that a goto would give you. Gotos are BAD, very very > bad. TS> Whom do I pay to have this annoying clueless asshole shot? TS> OH MY GOD, I really can't take any more.
Well well well, is that how we act these days if we see something we don't like?
Anyway, I totally agree with Rob: if the code can be written without a goto and produce the same efficient assembly (or better, see Robs change) it should be written without it. goto's are for lazy people - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |