Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 17 Jan 2003 15:14:17 -0800 | From | William Lee Irwin III <> | Subject | Re: MAX_IO_APICS #ifdef'd wrongly |
| |
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 07:53:41AM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > Summit needs this too, so it should really be CONFIG_NUMA at least. > Ideally this would go into subarch if we can move it cleanly (hint, hint ;-)) > But other than that, yes ... I'll merge it. > Thanks,
I shot for the one liner that fixed the case I could test. Shoving it into subarch is cleaner, but needs more code movement and changes the prior semantics. The prior semantics were broken for larger Summit configurations, hmm. Maybe _all_ the array sizes should go into some kind of subarch analogue of param.h, e.g. mach_param.h
The only one I can think of that doesn't fly is NR_IRQS; once there are more interrupt sources than FIRST_SYSTEM_VECTOR - FIRST_DEVICE_VECTOR the whole of arch/i386/ appears to explode.
Someone somewhere should probably take notice of that.
Bill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |