lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
    On Sun, Jan 12 2003, Rob Wilkens wrote:
    > On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 16:40, Rik van Riel wrote:
    > > OK, now imagine the dcache locking changing a little bit.
    > > You need to update this piece of (duplicated) code in half
    > > a dozen places in just this function and no doubt in dozens
    > > of other places all over fs/*.c.
    > >
    > > >From a maintenance point of view, a goto to a single block
    > > of error handling code is easier to maintain.
    > >
    >
    > There's no reason, though, that the error handling/cleanup code can't be
    > in an entirely separate function, and if speed is needed, there's no
    > reason it can't be an "inline" function. Or am I oversimplifying things
    > again?

    *plonk*

    --
    Jens Axboe

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:4.597 / U:0.116 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site