Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 12 Jan 2003 17:52:29 -0800 | From | William Lee Irwin III <> | Subject | Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? |
| |
At some point in the past, I wrote: >> Any specific concerns/issues/wishlist items you want taken care of >> before doing it or is it a "generalized comfort level" kind of thing? >> Let me know, I'd be much obliged for specific directions to move in.
On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 08:08:42PM -0500, Michael Kingsbury wrote: > As long as I can't unzip the latest, do a quick > 'make xconfig' w/o changing the defaults, > followed by > 'make bzImage', > and actually get the sucker to compile, I'd say go for it. But there's > still too much breakage. And until that breakage is fixed, you won't get > the next wave of people (users) who are curious to poke around with it. > (some of us don't care to take half a day just to figure out what to do to make something compile because > there's problems in the source.) > (Yes, I realize I have to customize the kernel some. But at the very > least the defaults shouldn't cause it to fall flat on its face.)
Hmm, I never do this, I've been recycling my own .configs for some time. Sounds like a valid concern, I'll give it a shot.
Bill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |