Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:39:37 +0100 (CET) | Subject | Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? | From | "Emiliano Gabrielli" <> |
| |
<quote who="Rob Wilkens"> > On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 17:52, Aaron Lehmann wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 05:34:58PM -0500, Rob Wilkens wrote: >> > You're wrong. You wouldn't have to jump over them any more than you have to jump >> over the "goto" statement. >> >> The goto is a conditional jump. You propose replacing it with a >> conditional jump past the error handling code predicated on the >> opposite condition. Where's the improvement? > > The goto is absolutely not a conditional jump. The if that precedes it is > conditional. The goto is not. The if is already there. > > -Rob
Oh my God ... really you are the only one on this list not to understand that hi has mispelled ?!?
Now I understand the reason of your trollness !!
-- Emiliano Gabrielli
dip. di Fisica 2° Università di Roma "Tor Vergata"
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |