Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Sat, 11 Jan 2003 17:44:57 -0800 | From | J Sloan <> | Subject | [OT] Noise on lkml (was Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently") |
| |
Rob Wilkens wrote:
>I'd say terribly presumptuous, but I don't think it is presumptuous to >say that if there are many patches (bug fixes, mostly) coming in that >the code that was originally there was of questionable quality. >
Your statements are at once so arrogant, yet so ignorant, it's hard to know where to even begin - but you are quite mistaken on several fronts; each new message from you reveals an unbridgeable gulf, of which you do not even seem aware.
I won't even begin to put together a point by point correction, it's all too tedious, and it's possible that you are here just to annoy and wear down the developers anyway -
Please start sending in patches or discussing kernel code, or even doing testing - if not, you might wish to seek out a different forum for your messages, where you might find a more receptive audience - I'll refrain from making specific suggestions at this time.
Best Regards,
Joe
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |