Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 30 Sep 2002 19:45:29 -0400 | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | Subject | Re: [patch] smptimers, old BH removal, tq-cleanup, 2.5.39 |
| |
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 06:38:03PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > see the workqueues patch i posted a couple of minutes ago. Does this solve > XFS's problems?
Not exactly. All your work on one queue is internally serialize. An totally unserialized workqueue would be best for XFS.
> why is it ugly? I can add a simple interface to the workqueues subsystem > that will bind the XFS worker threads to given sets of CPUs. That should > give you per-CPU workqueues, with separate per-CPU locking.
That would also work, but would require more code in XFS than my above suggestion.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |