Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 18 Sep 2002 13:50:50 -0300 (BRT) | From | Rik van Riel <> | Subject | Re: [BENCHMARK] contest results for 2.5.36 |
| |
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > No Load: > > Kernel Time CPU > > 2.4.19 68.14 99% > > 2.4.20-pre7 68.11 99% > > 2.5.34 69.88 99% > > 2.4.19-ck7 68.40 98% > > 2.4.19-ck7-rmap 68.73 99% > > 2.4.19-cc 68.37 99% > > 2.5.36 69.58 99% > > page_add/remove_rmap. Be interesting to test an Alan kernel too.
Yes, but why are page_add/remove_rmap slower in 2.5 than in Con's -rmap kernel ? ;)
> > Process Load: > > Kernel Time CPU > > 2.4.19 81.10 80% > > 2.4.20-pre7 81.92 80% > > 2.5.34 71.39 94% > > 2.5.36 71.80 94% > > Ingo ;)
Looks like an unfair sched_yield, the process load is supposed to get 20% of the CPU (one process in process_load vs. make -j4).
For the other results I agree with you, furter VM improvements in 2.5 will probably fix those.
cheers,
Rik -- Spamtrap of the month: september@surriel.com
http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |