lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [BENCHMARK] contest results for 2.5.36
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Andrew Morton wrote:

> > No Load:
> > Kernel Time CPU
> > 2.4.19 68.14 99%
> > 2.4.20-pre7 68.11 99%
> > 2.5.34 69.88 99%
> > 2.4.19-ck7 68.40 98%
> > 2.4.19-ck7-rmap 68.73 99%
> > 2.4.19-cc 68.37 99%
> > 2.5.36 69.58 99%
>
> page_add/remove_rmap. Be interesting to test an Alan kernel too.

Yes, but why are page_add/remove_rmap slower in 2.5 than in
Con's -rmap kernel ? ;)

> > Process Load:
> > Kernel Time CPU
> > 2.4.19 81.10 80%
> > 2.4.20-pre7 81.92 80%
> > 2.5.34 71.39 94%
> > 2.5.36 71.80 94%
>
> Ingo ;)

Looks like an unfair sched_yield, the process load is supposed
to get 20% of the CPU (one process in process_load vs. make -j4).

For the other results I agree with you, furter VM improvements in
2.5 will probably fix those.

cheers,

Rik
--
Spamtrap of the month: september@surriel.com

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.213 / U:0.080 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site