Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 10 Sep 2002 19:15:08 +0200 | From | Mike Galbraith <> | Subject | Re: XFS? |
| |
At 04:20 PM 9/9/2002 -0500, Shawn wrote: >XFS needs a sponser. Who amung Linus's circle of trust cares to comment >or re-evaluate? > >If no one, I guess it's a moot point.
(see below)
>On 09/09, Andi Kleen said something like: > > Thunder from the hill <thunder@lightweight.ods.org> writes: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, khromy wrote: > > > > What's up with XFS in linux-2.5? I've seen some patches sent to the > list > > > > but I havn't seen any replies from linus.. What needs to be done to > > > > finally merge it? > > > > > > It has been stated quite regularly that XFS > > > a) doesn't always work like it should yet > > > > That's quite bogus. While not being perfect XFS just works fine for lots > > of people in production and performs very well for a lot of tasks. > > > > > b) involves some changes which Linus doesn't like in particular, for > > > pretty good reasons. > > > > I think that's FUD too. That last patch had 6 lines or so of changes > > to generic code, everything else was already merged.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
-Mike
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |