Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 6 Aug 2002 00:41:12 -0500 | From | Tyler Longren <> | Subject | Re: 2.4.19, USB_HID only works compiled in, not as module |
| |
Could this be a problem with my chipset (Via)? I'm on an Abit VP6 motherboard. I'm actually suprised I haven't had problems with ide in 2.4.19 (the hpt controller and via).
Below is the usb stuff from lspci -v: 00:07.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB (rev 16) (prog-if 00 [UHCI]) Subsystem: VIA Technologies, Inc. (Wrong ID) USB Controller Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 12 I/O ports at d400 [size=32] Capabilities: [80] Power Management version 2
00:07.3 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB (rev 16) (prog-if 00 [UHCI]) Subsystem: VIA Technologies, Inc. (Wrong ID) USB Controller Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 12 I/O ports at d800 [size=32] Capabilities: [80] Power Management version 2 On Tue, 6 Aug 2002 07:02:22 +1000
tyler
Brad Hards <bhards@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Tue, 6 Aug 2002 02:56, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 12:00:55AM +1000, Brad Hards wrote: > > > Greg: I think this was one of your patches, associated with the > > > HIDINPUT patch. It looks like the return value is wrong. See > > > below. > > > > > > --- include/linux/hiddev.h.orig Mon Aug 5 23:19:54 2002 > > > +++ include/linux/hiddev.h Mon Aug 5 23:56:34 2002 > > > @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ > > > int __init hiddev_init(void); > > > void __exit hiddev_exit(void); > > > #else > > > -static inline void *hiddev_connect(struct hid_device *hid) { > > > return NULL; } +static inline void *hiddev_connect(struct > > > hid_device *hid) { return -1; } static inline void > > > hiddev_disconnect(struct hid_device *hid){ } static inline void > > > hiddev_hid_event(struct hid_device *hid, unsigned int usage, int > > > value) { } static inline int hiddev_init(void) { return 0;} > > > > ??? Why return -1 as a void *? > > > > The only caller of hiddev_connect is: > > if (!hiddev_connect(hid)) > > hid->claimed |= HID_CLAIMED_HIDDEV; > > > > Hm, seems like you don't want a void * there at all, but a int, > > right? > I assume so. > > > But that doesn't explain the error people are having with the code > > compiled in. > No - while doing the investigation, I noted that dmesg was showing > input0,hiddev0: USB HID v1.10 Keyboard [045e:001d] on usb2:3.0 > input1,hiddev0: USB HID v1.10 Pointer [045e:001d] on usb2:3.1 > input2,hiddev0: USB HID v1.00 Mouse [Logitech USB-PS/2 Mouse M-BA47] > on usb2:4.0 > > with CONFIG_USB_HIDDEV turned off. > > So I chased that down to the above conclusion. > > But I still don't see the problem, and can't duplicate it. > > Brad > - -- > http://conf.linux.org.au. 22-25Jan2003. Perth, Australia. Birds in > Black.-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org > > iD8DBQE9TufiW6pHgIdAuOMRAojFAKCmSOjjTwcp6z7tPKeR6kaokAF71wCginFW > 5/94epXIyAJlfpFGtmQqxOY= > =Ywrd > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe > linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |