lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] 2.5.30 IDE 113
Uz.ytkownik Jens Axboe napisa?:

> Ho hum, well I think it's only ugly in the way it had to be done
> previously. Right now I think the usage is pretty nice, actually

Ho ho. I can't do it the pretty way, becouse the queue synchronization
doesn't work as expected :-).

> request_fn(q)
> {
> rq = elv_next_request();
> start_request(rq);
> blk_stop_queue(q);
> }
>
> isr()
> {
> handle_completion();
> blk_start_queue(queue);
> }
>
> The API works nicely regardless of queue depth and how many requests
> request_fn consumes.

You know why I *hate* IDE_BUSY bit 8-)..

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [W:0.059 / U:2.504 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site