Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 2 Aug 2002 12:00:40 -0400 | From | Benjamin LaHaise <> | Subject | Re: manipulating sigmask from filesystems and drivers |
| |
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 08:39:34AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > We already do this right, and there is no reason to _break_ the fact that > we do it right. Can you come up with a _single_ reason for why we should > break existing standardized binary interfaces?
Personally, I think that uninterruptible file io is good, but there needs to be an upper limit to the maximum size of the io. As it stands today, someone can do a single multigigabyte read or write that is completely uninterruptible (even to kill -9), but could take a minute or more to complete.
-ben -- "You will be reincarnated as a toad; and you will be much happier." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |