Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 2 Aug 2002 18:01:32 +0200 | From | Dave Jones <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH]: linux-2.5.30uc0 MMU-less patches |
| |
On Sat, Aug 03, 2002 at 01:54:26AM +1000, gerg wrote:
> > I didn't check the code in detail, but > > is there really that little that can be shared between > > the regular mm/ ? > No, there is actually a lot in common. Probably something > like 70%. This is really a question of organization.
That's what I guessed on just a cursory glance at the patch.
> I would much prefer to see the non-mmu support in with mm. > But it would mean a few #ifdef's in there to allow for > the differences.
Versus massive code duplication, I think the ifdef's would be a better approach, especially if you can hide them away in headers.
Dave
-- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |